What’s This About Merit Pay For Teachers?

While I completely agree that something needs to be done about our education system, some of Obama’s education reform platform might actually deepen some of the problems that already exist. For example, Obama wants merit pay for teachers, and while the idea of rewarding excellent teachers is a good one, I’m not sure this is the best or even a close to good solution. According to what I have seen and read, Obama’s idea is to pay teachers more if their students excel on standardized tests and to pay less well those teachers whose students don’t do well on these tests.

Apart from the enormous problems associated with standardized testing (many of which I’ve bemoaned in other blog posts), this policy will only deepen racial and social tensions. We already know that students in inner city schools and “poor” areas test poorly, and we already know that this is due to lack of attendance, lack of guidance at home (you do your homework, or no wii for you), and even student aggression (refusal to do homework, physically attacking teachers, etc.). None of these problems will be solved by withholding pay from the teachers who dare to work in these areas.

Instead, better teachers (or just smart ones) will flock to already successful school districts (i.e. those with high retention, high standardized test scores, and high success rates in college placement). Why wouldn’t they? They’ll earn more there. And while it’s nice to think that teachers teach for the love of teaching (and most of us do), it’s also true that there are mortgages to pay and our own children to put through college, etc. Money certainly matters; Obama has that part right.

Student performance is not based solely on teacher ability. Students can excel with mediocre teachers, and students can fail with excellent teachers. There are too many variables involved in producing good students. Are they required by their parent or guardian to do homework on a regular basis? Are they getting enough sleep? The right diet? Do they have parental support in terms of parents actively involved in their education (from attending school plays to reading to them at night as infants and toddlers; these are shown to improve student performance later on)? Have any learning disabilities been diagnosed and properly treated? Are they “happy”? And last but by no means least, are they even capable of excelling in school? Not everyone is clever, not everyone has the “brains” to do well in school (let alone on standardized tests, which some very intelligent people can do poorly on due to a range of factors).
This is not to say that there aren’t “bad” teachers aren’t out there, or teachers who just don’t pull their weight or know enough about their subject to teach it well. That’s all true, but this policy won’t “find” these teachers, much less weed them out. They’ll just go where affluent students are getting tutoring to fill in the gaps in the classroom, where test scores are high. Or they’ll settle for the pay they get, as they’ve been doing all along. Either way, students in struggling school districts lose out. No one is going to gamble that they can make a difference in schools where student and parent apathy and indifference outweigh anything a teacher might do or say. Teachers can’t and shouldn’t be expected to solve all the problems associated with educating students; there are too many of them that occur outside the classroom and the school.

4 thoughts on “What’s This About Merit Pay For Teachers?

  1. i was reading a little about this yesterday and having some of the same thoughts as you. i really don’t think there is a magic solution to our education problems. i certainly don’t think merit pay is going to do anything. i think i read that “no child left behind” is being kept in place. whoopie. that has done nothing, as far as i can see. i saw, too that he’s talking about a longer school day. yeah, make kids have to sit in class longer, be quiet longer. it’s already so hard for some of them because they don’t get the recess breaks that they used to. how is this possibly going to help? it’s no wonder so many of my mom friends home school.

  2. Yes, a longer school day and longer school year (the latter, I’m pretty okay with). The longer school day is based, he says, on the fact that they have them in South Korea (and South Koreans, Asians in general, do better in maths and sciences than our own kids). One of the problems with that, though, is that our culture doesn’t place a premium on education as many Asian countries do. There isn’t much pride involved in academic excellence here as there; that’s a socio-cultural thing, and longer school days won’t address that. It’ll be just as you say, just one more strain on both kids and their teachers.

  3. Umong teachers there is already fine line between equal opportunity. Teachers that have more education receive more money, but the energy for political gain (spoken money) needs to be spent on kids. I have observed teachers that are distracted by the material and monetary gains (if you want to call them that) that are available if you play the game. Teachers need to go into education to teach, and not concern themselves with money. Teaching is a lifestyle. Part of that is the vacation time built into the school year. As my summer was cut by days and then a week or two and additional education was required, I used that as one of many reasons to get out of teaching.

What say you?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s