If one more person tells me some variation of “there is no leader in the WH,” my head may explode. Of course there is. This idea that Obama is somehow removed from, above, or not up to his scrawny neck in what his administration is doing must be dispelled. Now, do I think he’s the brains behind the operation? No way, I don’t think he’s that bright, but I do think he’s surrounded himself with people who have plenty of brains and plenty of nefarious, traitorous plans. I also believe that he’s well-aware of and ideologically happy with every single thing that has led to the myriad scandals that stink up our White House. Do I think that he gets his hands dirty (beyond going out and spreading vile lies, doubts, and suspicion of the TEA Party and conservatives more generally), that some “smoking gun” will be found tying him directly to the IRS, DOJ, AP, Rosen, NSA, or any other scandal we currently know about or ones that may yet be revealed? Nope.
But it’s his Chicago stench that permeates every single scandal, up to and including Benghazi. The bullying, the thuggery, the blackmail, the boot on the neck, the manipulation of events for a specific end . . . all of it is straight out of Chicago, specifically, and leftist “thought” more broadly.
It’s no mistake that his czars and other appointments are a rag-tag assortment of dirty dealers, traitors, commies, anti-Semites, radicals, and fascist zealots. Those people didn’t just materialize around him; remember, he sought out this type of person all the way back in college. That never ended, as we can see all too clearly.
What kind of a person appoints the freaks and fringe fanatics that Obama has? Remember his TSA nominee who stated that white supremacists and “Christian identity groups” were America’s “biggest threat”? That’s what Obama believes with all his tiny, shriveled evil little heart. Hell, his DHS said as much in their memo to all of America’s law enforcement in 2009.
Last week, Obama announced the war on terror over; for him, it is. Indeed, it was never really about Islamic terror for him; he happily supports both in word and deed (and with our money) all sorts of Islamic terrorism and terrorist groups. Hell, he calls various Islamofascist groups his “peace partners.” That he’s droned a bunch of them doesn’t change that fact. And it’s right in line with Obama, anyway, he’s famous for sacrificing friends, family, leftists, whomever for “the cause.” But Islamic terror isn’t his focus, what he does has been a means to an end–his support for the Arab Spring wasn’t an accident, nor was he unaware that Islamofascist states would emerge (everyone was saying so from Glenn Beck to John Bolton). Neither were any of Obama’s moves an accident from basically encouraging Iran to nuke up to removing the missile defenses in Poland.
We may not be able to connect the dots yet, but it’s becoming pretty clear that it’s all of one piece, including what he’s been doing right here in America. To Obama, the nation’s real enemies, his real enemies, are people who “want to make America a better place to live,” people who support the 10th Amendment, people who are pro-life, Christian, Jewish, white, patriots. He’s made this crystal clear since practically Day One with every appointment, every czar, every policy, every word.
Back in September of ’09, I wrote:
[Van] Jones is a racist, a self-proclaimed communist, a “truther,” and a proponent of destroying the American system and replacing it with a . . . well, with another one that favors people of color and subjugates whites. I’m not making this up. Van Jones has said it. All of it. He talks of white people purposely poisoning minorities with pesticides, he signed a document demanding investigation into our government’s role in either allowing or actually perpetrating the 9/11 attacks on this country, he’s spoken of using the green movement to install minorities in key positions of power and remaking the system to favor them, and he’s called republicans assholes. Well, okay, that last one doesn’t matter; we’ve all said worse about our political adversaries at one time or another. But the other points, they matter. Each of them alone should exclude him from the president’s inner circle, and together, they paint a picture of a dangerous, racist, anti-American communist who should not be allowed to enter the White House gift shop let alone sit in the Oval Office and snuggle with the president.
. . . . .
You have to wonder, if you’ve got a brain in your head, what is going on with the other BO czars. Who are they and what are they hiding? What is BO’s agenda in having such radical and controversial figures surrounding him, advising him, making policy for all of us and doing so well outside the checks and balances set up by the Constitution?
Well, there’s John Holdren, BO’s Science Czar, who has a neato idea to control population. Apparently, he’s a big fan of China’s forced abortion policy and even advocated putting sterilization drugs in America’s food and water supply. He’s also said that forced abortions “could be sustained under the current Constitution.” Um, okay, but don’t you think that’s a bit much? And this man is in key policy position, unchecked by Congress or anyone else, advising the president of the United States. He’s not in some think tank or university espousing crazy theories and philosophizing, he is actually helping shape American policy. This is the problem, not his wacked out ideas.
Holdren apologists point out, correctly, that Holdren preferred “milder methods” of population control. Um, okay, so what happens if the people don’t line up for population control abortions of their own free will? Do you honestly think that if the government controls the healthcare system and Holdren or BO decide that “population growth” is a threat to either the environment or the economy/healthcare system that they won’t start limiting the number of children people can have, forcing abortion on those who’ve maxed their “quota”? This sounds crazy, but what the hell is someone with crazy ideas like this doing in the White House if not to put those ideas in motion? Again, the apologists say that these ideas were expressed in the 1970′s and as such are “dated” and not relevant today. Another apologist angle is that the book presents a “theory” and does not recommend a “practice.” Well, so did The Communist Manifesto. Remember that nifty little book?
Another fun BO czar is Mark Lloyd, BO’s Diversity Czar. He’s a fun guy who thinks that Chavez’s coup in Venezuela was beautifully accomplished and that his control of use of the media should be emulated here in the U. S. God forbid the people have access to anything that might be anti-BO. I wonder how much he had to do with the “flag the fishy” campaign? Anyway, he finds free speech rather pesky especially from the conservatives, having the unfortunate effect of allowing people to express their dissent. The best place to stop free speech, according to this lovely man, is by forcing right wing radio off the air with 100% taxes on their operating costs; once that pushes them off the airwaves, their license will be handed over to a (liberal or progressive) minority group (this is where the “diversity” thing comes into play, I guess, you know making sure that all talk radio leans left. Lots of diversity there.). I never listen to talk radio, but apparently, there are far right discussions taking place on those stations. So what? If you don’t like it, don’t listen. The people who are listening are obviously of the same mind, so shutting them down won’t do anything about changing ideology, it’ll simply drive people to the internet (if BO doesn’t declare an “emergency” and shut it down, anyway) or to Fox News (which I do watch). At least until they figure out a way to push Fox off the air. Again, though, not being able to see or hear views with which you agree does not change your own views, so I find this rather silly. And frightening.
And let’s not forget Michael Copps at the FCC and “net neutrality”:
And there it is, the admission. There is a narrow window of time, while BO is still prancing around the WH playing grown up, to force through his radical agenda, an agenda that apparently includes regulating (or whatever you call “filtering and funneling” the right information to the American public) the internet, ensuring that information (the correct information, Herr Copps) reaches the masses in the correct manner and correct measure. Can’t rely on “flag the fishy“campaigns forever, now can we? And note, too, that like all good progessives, Copps understands that they may need to settle for a “down payment” (aka “a starter home“) on the publicly-funded, government-run propaganda machine of the (not so distant) future.
Part of what we’ve seen develop over the past few weeks is the Obama camp’s purposeful promotion of the image of a detached, disinterested, ditzy dimwit so that we will all blame someone, anyone other than Obama himself. I’ve bought into it myself, so I understand where people are coming from, but if nothing else has become clear over the course of the past several months, it’s that Obama is central to what is going on in terms of discriminating against conservatives, Christians, veterans, and pretty much everyone who disagrees with him on any point. Might he be a puppet? Sure. That’s even likely, but it does not exculpate him. He is not an innocent victim here.
The innocent victims are we, the people and our Constitutional Republic. People keep thinking that he’s incompetent, a failed leader, but that’s true only if his goal is to support America, keep her and her people safe, to protect and defend her Constitution. Because, yes, a thousand times, yes, he’s totally incompetent at that.
But here’s the secret: he’s not applying himself to those goals. He never has and he never will.
Listen again to the great and fearless Andrew Breitbart: